↓ Skip to main content

A Framework to Assess Biogeochemical Response to Ecosystem Disturbance Using Nutrient Partitioning Ratios

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Framework to Assess Biogeochemical Response to Ecosystem Disturbance Using Nutrient Partitioning Ratios
Published in
Ecosystems, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9934-1
Authors

J. Marty Kranabetter, Kendra K. McLauchlan, Sara K. Enders, Jennifer M. Fraterrigo, Philip E. Higuera, Jesse L. Morris, Edward B. Rastetter, Rebecca Barnes, Brian Buma, Daniel G. Gavin, Laci M. Gerhart, Lindsey Gillson, Peter Hietz, Michelle C. Mack, Brenden McNeil, Steven Perakis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
South Africa 2 3%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Unspecified 13 18%
Researcher 10 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 27%
Unspecified 19 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 11%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,691,484
of 12,230,555 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#234
of 740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,861
of 328,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,230,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.