↓ Skip to main content

Biodegradable polydioxanone stents in the treatment of adult patients with tracheal narrowing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biodegradable polydioxanone stents in the treatment of adult patients with tracheal narrowing
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12890-015-0160-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludek Stehlik, Vladislav Hytych, Jana Letackova, Petr Kubena, Martina Vasakova

Abstract

Biodegradable stents that disintegrate after a period of time are expected to be well tolerated and have advantages over other stents that are more commonly used in practice today. Polydioxanone is a biodegradable polymer that is widely used during surgery with absorbable sutures. We present cases from the first four patients to undergo a tracheal polydioxanone stent insertion. Indications included significant non-malignant tracheal stenosis in cases where primary surgical treatment was not possible. The stents were implanted using rigid bronchoscopy and patients received regular follow-ups as needed. This use of biodegradable stents in adult patients was a novel, previously untested approach. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and was based on a project entitled; "Biodegradable stents in the management of stenoses of large airways" (project NT 14146-3/2013). Six biodegradable stents were implanted in four patients with benign stenoses. No technical difficulties occurred and no serious or life-threatening events were recorded. All patients reported some benefit from treatment. Polydioxanone tracheal stents can be considered when a need for temporary support is expected, and as an alternative to other stents if the latter could compromise the patient. Owing to limited experience and observed disadvantages, further research is needed to fully assess this treatment. This work is based on project NT14146 - Biodegradable stents in the management of stenoses of the large airways (2013-2015, MZ0/NT), registered from May 1, 2013 in The Research and Development and Innovation Information System of the Czech Republic and in ClinicalTrials.gov, reg. no. NCT02620319 , December 2, 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Engineering 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,706
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,266
of 394,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#42
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.