↓ Skip to main content

The distance function effect on k-nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
292 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The distance function effect on k-nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets
Published in
SpringerPlus, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2941-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Yu Hu, Min-Wei Huang, Shih-Wen Ke, Chih-Fong Tsai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 494 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 15%
Student > Bachelor 71 14%
Student > Master 70 14%
Researcher 30 6%
Lecturer 22 4%
Other 56 11%
Unknown 170 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 140 28%
Engineering 97 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Mathematics 6 1%
Other 54 11%
Unknown 180 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,576,625
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#504
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,858
of 362,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#76
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.