↓ Skip to main content

Genetic variation in gonadal impairment in female survivors of childhood cancer: a PanCareLIFE study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic variation in gonadal impairment in female survivors of childhood cancer: a PanCareLIFE study protocol
Published in
BMC Cancer, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4834-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Lotte L. F. van der Kooi, Eva Clemens, Linda Broer, Oliver Zolk, Julianne Byrne, Helen Campbell, Marleen van den Berg, Claire Berger, Gabriele Calaminus, Uta Dirksen, Jeanette Falck Winther, Sophie D Fosså, Desiree Grabow, Riccardo Haupt, Melanie Kaiser, Tomas Kepak, Leontien Kremer, Jarmila Kruseova, Dalit Modan-Moses, Andreas Ranft, Claudia Spix, Peter Kaatsch, Joop S. E. Laven, Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, André G. Uitterlinden, Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, on behalf of the PanCareLIFE Consortium

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 22 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Psychology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 24 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,914,110
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,705
of 8,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,024
of 341,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#51
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.