↓ Skip to main content

Predicting 21st‐century polar bear habitat distribution from global climate models

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Monographs, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
276 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
517 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting 21st‐century polar bear habitat distribution from global climate models
Published in
Ecological Monographs, February 2009
DOI 10.1890/07-2089.1
Authors

George M. Durner, David C. Douglas, Ryan M. Nielson, Steven C. Amstrup, Trent L. McDonald, Ian Stirling, Mette Mauritzen, Erik W. Born, Øystein Wiig, Eric DeWeaver, Mark C. Serreze, Stanislav E. Belikov, Marika M. Holland, James Maslanik, Jon Aars, David A. Bailey, Andrew E. Derocher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 7 1%
United States 5 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 476 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 24%
Student > Bachelor 95 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 14%
Student > Master 68 13%
Other 39 8%
Other 62 12%
Unknown 58 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 268 52%
Environmental Science 123 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 1%
Social Sciences 6 1%
Other 28 5%
Unknown 71 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,197,825
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#97
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,560
of 179,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them