↓ Skip to main content

Oral infection of neonate gerbils by Neospora caninum tachyzoites

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral infection of neonate gerbils by Neospora caninum tachyzoites
Published in
Ciência Rural, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150475
Authors

Maiara Sanitá Tafner Ferreira, Fernanda Silveira Flores Vogel, Luis Antonio Sangioni, Augusto Weber, Patricia Bräunig, Marcos André Braz Vaz, Alfredo Skrebsky Cezar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,779,578
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#718
of 1,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,340
of 390,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,948 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.