You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vivo neutralization of dendrotoxin-mediated neurotoxicity of black mamba venom by oligoclonal human IgG antibodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-06086-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas H. Laustsen, Aneesh Karatt-Vellatt, Edward W. Masters, Ana Silvia Arias, Urska Pus, Cecilie Knudsen, Saioa Oscoz, Peter Slavny, Daniel T. Griffiths, Alice M. Luther, Rachael A. Leah, Majken Lindholm, Bruno Lomonte, José María Gutiérrez, John McCafferty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 48% |
| Scientists | 16 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#169,123
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,404
of 58,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,302
of 356,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#49
of 1,444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.