↓ Skip to main content

Reabilitação auditiva na Síndrome de Treacher Collins por meio de prótese auditiva ancorada no osso

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reabilitação auditiva na Síndrome de Treacher Collins por meio de prótese auditiva ancorada no osso
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.rpped.2015.01.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Fernando Polanski, Anna Clara Plawiak, Angela Ribas

Abstract

To describe a case of hearing rehabilitation with bone anchored hearing aid in a patient with Treacher Collins syndrome. 3 years old patient, male, with Treacher Collins syndrome and severe complications due to the syndrome, mostly related to the upper airway and hearing. He had bilateral atresia of external auditory canals, and malformation of the pinna. The initial hearing rehabilitation was with bone vibration arch, but there was poor acceptance due the discomfort caused by skull compression. It was prescribed a model of bone-anchored hearing aid, in soft band format. The results were evaluated through behavioral hearing tests and questionnaires Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (Muss) and Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-Mais). The patient had a higher acceptance of the bone-anchored hearing aid compared to the traditional bone vibration arch. Audiological tests and the speech and auditory skills assessments also showed better communication and hearing outcomes. The bone-anchored hearing aid is a good option in hearing rehabilitation in this syndrome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#9,589,777
of 12,484,918 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#101
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,746
of 346,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,484,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.