↓ Skip to main content

Testing and comparison of four ionic tracers to measure stream flow loss by multiple tracer injection

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrological Processes, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing and comparison of four ionic tracers to measure stream flow loss by multiple tracer injection
Published in
Hydrological Processes, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/hyp.3360080206
Authors

Gary W. Zellweger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 26%
Engineering 8 24%
Environmental Science 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2007.
All research outputs
#8,236,607
of 24,674,353 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#743
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,583
of 73,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,674,353 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.