↓ Skip to main content

Testing and comparison of four ionic tracers to measure stream flow loss by multiple tracer injection

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrological Processes, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing and comparison of four ionic tracers to measure stream flow loss by multiple tracer injection
Published in
Hydrological Processes, March 1994
DOI 10.1002/hyp.3360080206
Authors

Gary W. Zellweger

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 32%
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 36%
Environmental Science 6 24%
Engineering 4 16%
Mathematics 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2007.
All research outputs
#4,174,458
of 13,883,245 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#309
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,986
of 271,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,883,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.