You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continuous diffusion of oxygen improves diabetic foot ulcer healing when compared with a placebo control: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wound Care, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.sup9.s30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Q Niederauer, Joel E Michalek, Qianqian Liu, Klearchos K Papas, Lawrence A Lavery, David G Armstrong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,250,133
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wound Care
#99
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,838
of 335,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wound Care
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.