↓ Skip to main content

The problem with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 2,565)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
390 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The problem with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, December 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie E Reed, Alan J Card

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 390 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 1142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 279 24%
Student > Bachelor 160 14%
Student > Postgraduate 83 7%
Other 77 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 5%
Other 171 15%
Unknown 320 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 275 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 274 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 62 5%
Social Sciences 43 4%
Psychology 25 2%
Other 131 11%
Unknown 343 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 284. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#126,962
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#38
of 2,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,925
of 398,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.