↓ Skip to main content

Cross-talk among writers, readers, and erasers of m6A regulates cancer growth and progression

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross-talk among writers, readers, and erasers of m6A regulates cancer growth and progression
Published in
Science Advances, October 2018
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar8263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Subbarayalu Panneerdoss, Vijay K Eedunuri, Pooja Yadav, Santosh Timilsina, Subapriya Rajamanickam, Suryavathi Viswanadhapalli, Nourhan Abdelfattah, Benjamin C Onyeagucha, Xiadong Cui, Zhao Lai, Tabrez A Mohammad, Yogesh K Gupta, Tim Hui-Ming Huang, Yufei Huang, Yidong Chen, Manjeet K Rao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Professor 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 40 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Chemistry 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 46 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,745,384
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#8,109
of 12,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,537
of 354,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#168
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.