↓ Skip to main content

Evidence that RNA Viruses Drove Adaptive Introgression between Neanderthals and Modern Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
69 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
548 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence that RNA Viruses Drove Adaptive Introgression between Neanderthals and Modern Humans
Published in
Cell, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.034
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Enard, Dmitri A. Petrov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 548 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 366 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 20%
Researcher 68 19%
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Student > Master 37 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 68 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 113 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 4%
Arts and Humanities 9 2%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 84 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 904. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#19,524
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#144
of 17,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358
of 355,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#4
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.