↓ Skip to main content

Talking about living and dying with the oldest old: public involvement in a study on end of life care in care homes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Palliative Care, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Talking about living and dying with the oldest old: public involvement in a study on end of life care in care homes
Published in
BMC Palliative Care, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-684x-10-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Goodman, Elspeth Mathie, Marion Cowe, Alex Mendoza, Daphne Westwood, Diane Munday, Patricia M Wilson, Clare Crang, Katherine Froggatt, Steve Iliffe, Jill Manthorpe, Heather Gage, Stephen Barclay

Abstract

Public involvement in research on sensitive subjects, such as death and dying, can help to ensure that questions are framed to reflect the interests of their peers, develop a shared understanding of issues raised, and moderate the often unequal power relationship between researcher and participant. This paper describes the contribution and impact of older members of a Public Involvement in Research group (PIRg) to a study on living and dying in care homes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Australia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 21 29%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Social Sciences 11 15%
Psychology 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,345,736
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Palliative Care
#809
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,965
of 244,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Palliative Care
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.