↓ Skip to main content

In vivo depletion and genetic targeting of mouse intestinal CX3CR1+ mononuclear phagocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Immunotechnology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo depletion and genetic targeting of mouse intestinal CX3CR1+ mononuclear phagocytes
Published in
Immunotechnology, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jim.2015.12.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Balázs Koscsó, Kavitha Gowda, Milena Bogunovic

Abstract

Mononuclear phagocytes (MPs) are an essential component of the intestinal immune system. They are comprised of a few dendritic cell and macrophage subsets, all with the common ability to sample extracellular milieu and to discriminate between dangerous and innocuous signals. Despite the commonality, each MP subset acquires distinct developmental pathways and unique functions, likely to fulfill needs of the tissue in which they reside. Some MP subsets develop from monocytes and are distinguished by their expression of CX3C-chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1). This manuscript summarizes our expertise in in vivo targeting of intestinal CX3CR1(+) MP subsets. The described tools might be useful for studies of CX3CR1(+) MP function in various murine experimental models, particularly under non-inflammatory conditions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,874,146
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Immunotechnology
#4,413
of 4,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,950
of 383,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunotechnology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.