↓ Skip to main content

Auditory integration training and other sound therapies for autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Auditory integration training and other sound therapies for autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003681.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yashwant Sinha, Natalie Silove, Andrew Hayen, Katrina Williams

Abstract

Auditory integration therapy was developed as a technique for improving abnormal sound sensitivity in individuals with behavioural disorders including autism spectrum disorders. Other sound therapies bearing similarities to auditory integration therapy include the Tomatis Method and Samonas Sound Therapy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 239 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 17%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Other 19 8%
Other 57 23%
Unknown 34 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 28%
Psychology 44 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 13%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Arts and Humanities 10 4%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 43 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#685,257
of 14,737,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,021
of 11,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,921
of 209,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,737,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.