↓ Skip to main content

Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004958.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilco Jacobs, Paul C Willems, Jacques van Limbeek, Ronald Bartels, Paul Pavlov, Patricia G Anderson, F Cumhur Oner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 20%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 28 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2015.
All research outputs
#10,648,911
of 13,384,198 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,615
of 10,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,804
of 358,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#186
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,384,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.