↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Arthritis Research, January 2000
DOI 10.1186/ar65
Pubmed ID
Authors

David H Garabrant, Constantine Dumas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Colombia 1 5%
Greece 1 5%
Unknown 17 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Other 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 76%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,543,361
of 13,610,713 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research
#81
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,343
of 264,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,610,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them