You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transposable element detection from whole genome sequence data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mobile DNA, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13100-015-0055-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam D. Ewing |
| Abstract |
The number of software tools available for detecting transposable element insertions from whole genome sequence data has been increasing steadily throughout the last ~5 years. Some of these methods have unique features suiting them for particular use cases, but in general they follow one or more of a common set of approaches. Here, detection and filtering approaches are reviewed in the light of transposable element biology and the current state of whole genome sequencing. We demonstrate that the current state-of-the-art methods still do not produce highly concordant results and provide resources to assist future development in transposable element detection methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 384 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 26% |
| Researcher | 89 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 60 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 163 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 130 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Unknown | 63 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,260,149
of 25,619,480 outputs
Outputs from Mobile DNA
#41
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,207
of 401,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mobile DNA
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,619,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.