↓ Skip to main content

Migratory corridors of adult female Kemp's ridley turtles in the Gulf of Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Migratory corridors of adult female Kemp's ridley turtles in the Gulf of Mexico
Published in
Biological Conservation, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.014
Authors

Donna J. Shaver, Kristen M. Hart, Ikuko Fujisaki, Cynthia Rubio, Autumn R. Sartain-Iverson, Jaime Peña, Daniel Gomez Gamez, Raul de Jesus Gonzales Diaz Miron, Patrick M. Burchfield, Hector J. Martinez, Jaime Ortiz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Master 15 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 38%
Environmental Science 18 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 9 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,461,803
of 18,083,481 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,839
of 5,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,329
of 379,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#38
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,083,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.