↓ Skip to main content

Opposite Dynamics of GABA and Glutamate Levels in the Occipital Cortex during Visual Processing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opposite Dynamics of GABA and Glutamate Levels in the Occipital Cortex during Visual Processing
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, October 2018
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1214-18.2018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Kurcyus, Efsun Annac, Nina M. Hanning, Ashley D. Harris, Georg Oeltzschner, Richard Edden, Valentin Riedl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Other 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 23%
Psychology 6 14%
Unspecified 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#384,425
of 13,526,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#902
of 18,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,547
of 265,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#31
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,526,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.