↓ Skip to main content

Opposite Dynamics of GABA and Glutamate Levels in the Occipital Cortex during Visual Processing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opposite Dynamics of GABA and Glutamate Levels in the Occipital Cortex during Visual Processing
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, October 2018
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1214-18.2018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Kurcyus, Efsun Annac, Nina M. Hanning, Ashley D. Harris, Georg Oeltzschner, Richard Edden, Valentin Riedl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 26%
Psychology 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#434,629
of 14,533,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#974
of 19,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,073
of 272,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#33
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,533,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.