You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-11-189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara Preschl, Andreas Maercker, Birgit Wagner |
| Abstract |
Although numerous efficacy studies in recent years have found internet-based interventions for depression to be effective, there has been scant consideration of therapeutic process factors in the online setting. In face-to face therapy, the quality of the working alliance explains variance in treatment outcome. However, little is yet known about the impact of the working alliance in internet-based interventions, particularly as compared with face-to-face therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 366 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 14% |
| Researcher | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 67 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 203 | 54% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 7% |
| Unknown | 81 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,909,831
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,299
of 4,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,201
of 240,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.