↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for the management of dry mouth: topical therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
506 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for the management of dry mouth: topical therapies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008934.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Furness, Helen V Worthington, Gemma Bryan, Sarah Birchenough, Roddy McMillan

Abstract

Xerostomia (the feeling of dry mouth) is a common symptom especially in older adults. Causes of dry mouth include medications, autoimmune disease (Sjögren's Syndrome), radiotherapy or chemotherapy for cancer, hormone disorders and infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 498 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 17%
Student > Bachelor 54 11%
Researcher 49 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 9%
Student > Postgraduate 28 6%
Other 90 18%
Unknown 150 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 205 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 4%
Psychology 15 3%
Computer Science 9 2%
Other 51 10%
Unknown 164 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,431,789
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,925
of 13,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,886
of 249,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.