You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Misconceptions about Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Expenditure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-2-2-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Scott |
| Abstract |
The measurement of gas exchange has played an invaluable role in metabolic interpretation. The uptake of 1 liter of oxygen is often converted into an energy expenditure estimate of 21.1 kilojoules (e.g., 1 L O2 = 21.1 kJ or ~5 kcal). This article demonstrates both the importance of such a conversion and the potential for misinterpretation. Oxygen uptake during heavy and severe exercise will also be discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 20% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 65 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,982,350
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#538
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,239
of 431,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#503
of 855 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 855 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.