| Title |
Identification of the nutritional resources of larval sea lamprey in two Great Lakes tributaries using stable isotopes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Great Lakes Research, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jglr.2015.11.010 |
| Authors |
Thomas M. Evans, James E. Bauer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#1,477
of 1,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,171
of 397,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.