↓ Skip to main content

Biased sampling of methane release from northern lakes: A problem for extrapolation

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biased sampling of methane release from northern lakes: A problem for extrapolation
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, February 2016
DOI 10.1002/2015gl066501
Authors

Martin Wik, Brett F. Thornton, David Bastviken, Jo Uhlbäck, Patrick M. Crill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Brazil 1 1%
France 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 65 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 21%
Unspecified 8 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 11%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 2 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#928,753
of 12,342,171 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#2,263
of 12,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,957
of 337,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#199
of 1,279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.