↓ Skip to main content

Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12916-018-1164-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duncan McNab, John Freestone, Chris Black, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Paul Bowie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Engineering 12 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 31 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,003,467
of 24,775,802 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,363
of 3,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,809
of 351,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,775,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.