↓ Skip to main content

Early additional food and fluids for healthy breastfed full-term infants.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early additional food and fluids for healthy breastfed full-term infants.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006462.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Becker GE, Remmington S, Remmington T

Abstract

Widespread recommendations from health organisations encourage exclusive breastfeeding for six months. However the addition of other fluids or foods before six months is common practice in many countries and communities. This practice suggests perceived benefits of early supplementation or lack of awareness of the possible risks.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 95 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 19%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Psychology 7 7%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 11 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2013.
All research outputs
#514,524
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,213
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,850
of 257,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.