↓ Skip to main content

Relaxation therapies for the management of primary hypertension in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relaxation therapies for the management of primary hypertension in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004935.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather O Dickinson, Fiona R Beyer, Gary A Ford, Donald Nicolson, Fiona Campbell, Julia V Cook, James Mason

Abstract

Lifestyle interventions are often recommended as initial treatment for mild hypertension, but the efficacy of relaxation therapies is unclear.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 9 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Psychology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 29 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,335,355
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,900
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,877
of 257,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#269
of 452 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.