↓ Skip to main content

Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock – does the dose matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock – does the dose matter?
Published in
Critical Care, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc7774
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Pea, Pierluigi Viale

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 148 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 18%
Other 24 15%
Student > Postgraduate 23 14%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 12 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 68%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 19 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,559,895
of 13,617,860 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,439
of 4,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,852
of 263,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.