↓ Skip to main content

Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock – does the dose matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
61 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock – does the dose matter?
Published in
Critical Care, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc7774
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Pea, Pierluigi Viale

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 167 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 17%
Other 26 14%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Postgraduate 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Chemistry 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 34 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,220,039
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,013
of 6,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,448
of 124,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.