Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living

Agreed. And sometimes scientific peer review fails too. Like this paper: https://t.co/vmWFqOr3tt https://t.co/lnHcxi8j4C

@AkeyArqriser 지적설계론 옹호논문 싣고 탈탈 털렸는데, 게재 취소하긴 했어요. "proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks"란 표현이 있더라구요. https://t.co/oI6LTsqM8D

@RobLanfear @3rdreviewer @nbierne Or, you know, #handofgod (and not Maradona's) https://t.co/OHArE7Qkum

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

@dePolavieja, definitely, you are my favourite PLOS ONE editor 😜 https://t.co/6rFU7c8bkY @estebanmoro

Paper invokes God as the creator of human anatomy and is later retracted #HandOfGod #LaManoDeDios #openaccess https://t.co/6XoS1IGONr https://t.co/nMDYa41emT

@Hjorvik como este #handofgod https://t.co/csiNsdhcba

RT @Dr_ASpi: @StuartJRitchie you must have missed the Creator paper: https://t.co/WjqjZuzhJ3

RT @Dr_ASpi: @StuartJRitchie you must have missed the Creator paper: https://t.co/WjqjZuzhJ3

@StuartJRitchie you must have missed the Creator paper: https://t.co/WjqjZuzhJ3

Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/YvzlS9YHCf https://t.co/aF9iWzpoGO

RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…

@s4nt4tweet @darwinogouldien @ackryl @dorkbarn @R_Daneel_Oliva L'article peut être lu ici : https://t.co/b2JRMJ93mK

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

RT @eigenfactor: #HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https…

RT @PLOS: New: @PLOSONE Eds statement of intent to retract #creatorgate paper: https://t.co/dnfVPuYFoT

RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

#PLOSONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/RwCYLGeUH1

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

@BSR163 you missed this one then https://t.co/JlWalraICC

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

RT @Protohedgehog: Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https:…

Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https://t.co/bxFzqkleZx

@SFriedScientist Did you see this..? https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl (Don't want to drag it on, but seems we were right!)

RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…

【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https://t.co/VUZOumhfBO

RT @eigenfactor: #HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https…

#PLOSONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/ZSlIehBZ0x

RT @eigenfactor: #HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https…

RT @eigenfactor: #HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https…

RT @eigenfactor: #HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https…

#HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https://t.co/DEJ12RygRh

RT @BryanJFischer: Before PC Nazis censor it, scientific paper three times says human hand evidence of a Creator. https://t.co/SSBbBNKQJH

The proper design by the Creator! The explicit functional link indicates that the biomechanical characteristic... https://t.co/iMdte66evo

#PLOSONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/L8JEbbf237

Reviewers asleep on the job: https://t.co/BHylnPgC7A #UDKAAP

今、もっともアツい炎上論文。しかし、 "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." って、凄いなこれ。 / “PLOS O…” https://t.co/wVci8WdexL

@cecidiprinzio te acordás del paper de PlosOne? Se retractaron, no se si lo viste. https://t.co/MKuJKJwPJZ

RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA

Publicar por publicidad o publicar con criterio científico, un ejemplo de lo que sucede en algunas revistas de... https://t.co/VzOrM0891a

@PLOSONE This retraction is a shame. It disrespects the authors https://t.co/ziMYc1MmOK

I call this Victory. Thanks #plosone to your efficient move ! #CreatorIsNotScience #lemonde https://t.co/HBg2HfdLYA https://t.co/rhqUgpD9sP

@finalimperium Here's the original paper. https://t.co/lruTHRaEoe It is, by definition, an argument from ignorance - hence its rejection.

RT @BugsWormsNBats: Editorial quality control and open-access value-for-money called into question once again @PLOSONE https://t.co/ieEIRqs…

A recent paper in PLOS ONE study made reference to a 'CREATOR', and about the overall rationale and findings of... https://t.co/0G90WPX6W1

You're right @CT_Bergstrom @bluecology: #HandofGod's #altmetric score is 1840 https://t.co/zTP99JwcVK 😐

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

Bueno de un Creador (así con mayúscula). Veanlo, esta interesante https://t.co/24l5gSpT0L

RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93

RT @gonyebra: @arambaut They claim they meant "Nature" instead of "Creator" - English is so confusing :D https://t.co/cxD3p2Fype https://t.…

RT @gonyebra: @arambaut They claim they meant "Nature" instead of "Creator" - English is so confusing :D https://t.co/cxD3p2Fype https://t.…

RT @gonyebra: @arambaut They claim they meant "Nature" instead of "Creator" - English is so confusing :D https://t.co/cxD3p2Fype https://t.…

RT @gonyebra: @arambaut They claim they meant "Nature" instead of "Creator" - English is so confusing :D https://t.co/cxD3p2Fype https://t.…

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

RT @natnorden: no los veo muy comentadores del oso polar de @PLOSONE https://t.co/uR8tLlTur3

Who is to blame?, bad editorial work? bad peer reviewing? https://t.co/QVd39DwXca, at the end of the day, science watches over itself!

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

RT @BryanJFischer: Before PC Nazis censor it, scientific paper three times says human hand evidence of a Creator. https://t.co/SSBbBNKQJH

RT @mariodalmaso: ...readers raised concerns about language in the article that makes references to a 'Creator'... https://t.co/GMO7SedP4r

A translation error? Definitely a human one, if any, https://t.co/TokAuzCrCH

RT @cdanielcadena: ah, ellos pensaron que "creator" quería decir "nature (result of evolution)". pfff @PLOSONE https://t.co/VftSWH5gLf http…

RT @RobertLKruse: Twitter "peer review" got this paper retracted in less than a week after it went viral. Bad press motivates action. https…

Twitter "peer review" got this paper retracted in less than a week after it went viral. Bad press motivates action. https://t.co/TkJ8jNkAjy

RT @cdanielcadena: ah, ellos pensaron que "creator" quería decir "nature (result of evolution)". pfff @PLOSONE https://t.co/VftSWH5gLf http…

RT @cdanielcadena: ah, ellos pensaron que "creator" quería decir "nature (result of evolution)". pfff @PLOSONE https://t.co/VftSWH5gLf http…

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

Science and evolution clash PLOS ONE journal pulls https://t.co/lEEGBFNulR scientific exploration of a creators hand https://t.co/nMzSCyKged

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo