Holy #PLOSGate Batman https://t.co/nhJL9n46jX
This is not something you see in science everyday! Beuller, Beuller...... https://t.co/8YiZr2DON4
https://t.co/U0JPB7fTyT What? "the biomechanical [...] is the proper design by the Creator" @schneiderleonid @AgnesWold @lakemedel
Is PLOS one defending creationism? '...proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks...' https://t.co/nOTnMOTR83
RT @LegalizeBrain: Big pb with @PLOS ONE paper mentionning "The Creator" in abstract : https://t.co/DuQ1pdj0U7
RT @WvSchaik: Some of the comments on the intelligent design paper in @PLOSONE are comedy gold: https://t.co/0yjXZM5qI5
RT @tommyhigham: #PLOSONE paper says hands are "Proper design of the Creator". #neversubmittinganotherpaperthereEVER https://t.co/kg2XENgT5Z
RT @MalariaUnit: PLOS ONE article invokes "The Creator". How the hell does this get through peer review??? #PLOSONE https://t.co/KiiLz8HTVJ
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
Next: why bananas are perfect for peeling and holding! https://t.co/c9vOUfruyc https://t.co/Tu2cUWRAAE
@TrevorABranch @chris_harrod @geeclabCL Typos the least of @PLOSONE's probs when creationism slips under radar: https://t.co/DYyhnLZ4D6
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @nfeau: "Proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/aoiwCS8QdC WTH!!! Seriously @PLOSONE from @BenjPetre
March 02, 2016 at 11:51PM https://t.co/rzBmhBn9jP RT PLOSONE: PLOS ONE editors apologize that language was… https://t.co/FDzvfmOFGH
This #HandsOfGod paper suggests @PLOSONE is loosing it ... https://t.co/jOTcau3xF2 #bafflled https://t.co/z4UuHeApc8
has this paper @PLOSONE seen #peerreview process? read abstract https://t.co/lpQ7d9C1T2
RT @MalariaUnit: PLOS ONE article invokes "The Creator". How the hell does this get through peer review??? #PLOSONE https://t.co/KiiLz8HTVJ
PLOS ONE article invokes "The Creator". How the hell does this get through peer review??? #PLOSONE https://t.co/KiiLz8HTVJ
Yeah. This is really bad. Fortunately, the comments section of the paper offers some levity: https://t.co/c41Fmjb3x4 https://t.co/uQ53s4ckoc
#PLOSONE paper says hands are "Proper design of the Creator". #neversubmittinganotherpaperthereEVER https://t.co/kg2XENgT5Z
RT @mc_hankins: If you think the abstract is bad, check out the Supporting Information https://t.co/LhoKGruBa7 https://t.co/q4Pmfyx7aL
I can't believe this! They actually published a paper that says "is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/THkoSlOau4
RT @kjhvm: @geneticmaize Wow. Completely spurious unscientific conclusion in that paper. https://t.co/fLPx1OLivv
We were going to do some science on the mechanics of the hand but it was hard so we just quit and cited The Creator. https://t.co/0qvwoEeiGY
RT @DugaldMcG: The 'Hand of God' @plosone paper also needs a thorough edit for language and style... https://t.co/s8JWzUPnrp https://t.co/H…
Oops PLOS One - did you forget to read the paper before accepting it? Creator? Really? https://t.co/t7yLmzhDci
The 'Hand of God' @plosone paper also needs a thorough edit for language and style... https://t.co/s8JWzUPnrp https://t.co/HKy0lyUaN7
Article in @PLOSONE mentioned “creator” & creationist argument. Shitstorm ensues via comments: https://t.co/8oI7kG7NyH
Levée de boucliers d'éditeurs scientifiques de #PlosOne contre un article créationniste #lemonde #Science #goodnews https://t.co/JxjUBHDv7e
RT @BenjPetre: Hey #PLOSONE, is this a joke? Who is 'the Creator' in this article? https://t.co/v7QJuZs8EE #OMG @TheTweetOfGod
RT @JohnUrbanGenome: Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh
@mart1oeil @holyhologram Dans un des com': "Competing interests declared: I am a scientist." :-D https://t.co/L6nVCNWiJQ
@david_colquhoun Thought this might interest you. PLoS One and the Creator via @ProtoHedgehog ... https://t.co/ADAD1VRrLj
WTF ? Si les revues scientifiques internationales publient des articles créationnistes on va pas s'en sortir ! https://t.co/kezupEXqXd
RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…
RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
@PlOSONE Paper with 3 mentions of the 'Creator'. Once in the abstract, intro & discsn. #handofgod indeed :P https://t.co/vyJ5XnIues
@PLOSONE talking about this? https://t.co/A7omvy4Awc
Why isn't Hu, acknowledged for "collection of the data", an author for Liu et al. 2016? @PLOSONE | https://t.co/Xclg2pl9Oj
@PLOSONE this is the one and only #handofgod https://t.co/2sZWAmOWkp https://t.co/k5DQUwzd8L
@lemondefr Levée de boucliers des éditeurs scientifiques de #PlosOne contre un article créationniste. #GoodNews https://t.co/JxjUBHDv7e
How did this happen @PLOSONE? “Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention” !? | https://t.co/Xclg2pl9Oj
RT @mc_hankins: If you think the abstract is bad, check out the Supporting Information https://t.co/LhoKGruBa7 https://t.co/q4Pmfyx7aL
WTF ? The Creator really ?? quote " is the proper design by the Creator" https://t.co/KEDJKJZEU9
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @BenjPetre: Hey #PLOSONE, is this a joke? Who is 'the Creator' in this article? https://t.co/v7QJuZs8EE #OMG @TheTweetOfGod
@geneticmaize Wow. Completely spurious unscientific conclusion in that paper. https://t.co/fLPx1OLivv
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
Pro DESIGN-CREATIONISM AUTHORS make it to @PLOSONE. Next step is to retract paper, from PLoS ONE to ZERO - GPC https://t.co/D2q9GmGZcU
@Hao_and_Y read the abstract https://t.co/qU8kma03Mz
RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…
Prepare for the greatest facepalm - creationist article about hand coordination https://t.co/fHec8YIlSg
"Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention" :O #PLOSONE: https://t.co/4jgHCKD8UP
Comentario a articulo creacionista en PLOS https://t.co/Vu4WwFxKeW
Jajaja. Un artículo 'científico' que concluye que la mano humana es obra de 'el Creador' @PLOSONE O_o https://t.co/NnSrOxOo6i
Dans l'abstract: "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." https://t.co/Hb56EKIOIy
https://t.co/y41UtnZPUk The creator passed peer review...
@uadlup @PLOSONE ¡Imperdibles respuestas! No se las pierdan. https://t.co/2aAPSaauJe
.@PLOSONE staff respond quickly to Intelligent Design article. Good, but how did it get there in the first place? https://t.co/cuzCOb2vU1
RT @schneiderleonid: .@Richvn @sharmanedit and I theologically disproved the authors' claim of divine origin of the hand https://t.co/ov6sY…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
Renzhi Han you are a #disgrace 2 #science #PLOS One, You are a #failure too #miserableFailure #peerreview https://t.co/qU8kma03Mz
I want to know why @PLOSONE recently published a paper with frequent referrals to a "Creator". This is unacceptable! https://t.co/FJuKQ6i48L
RT @brachiofnord: https://t.co/0Hd6Iy1vly Somewhat old article getting traction just now because of "the Creator" @PLOSONE what gives? #han…
Most commented article on @PLOSONE? It's the will of the Creator. https://t.co/O7DmsSabpz
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
@dirtybiology Ça peut t'intéresser : du créationnisme publié dans PlosOne... WTF ? https://t.co/gKj1Z2yXdq
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
RT @mattbenton123: "Our study can confirm..that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" What the s**t @PLOSONE htt…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @Laelaps: "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." WTF, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/kSNX7KW3oN
RT @PLOS: PLOS ONE Managing Editor Iratxe Puebla addresses and apologizes for article “Creation” language https://t.co/DCR0sf4WHB
RT @Protohedgehog: 'Biomechanical features of hands are the proper design by the Creator' https://t.co/0zDSysFwAm I'm sorry, I thought this…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
@Protohedgehog Reply from PlosOne here (hope the link works). Unbelievable! https://t.co/xFJV49OFgo
RT @mc_hankins: If you think the abstract is bad, check out the Supporting Information https://t.co/LhoKGruBa7 https://t.co/q4Pmfyx7aL
If you think the abstract is bad, check out the Supporting Information https://t.co/LhoKGruBa7 https://t.co/q4Pmfyx7aL
Article back up for now: https://t.co/JHuEXMJfCk. Did @PLOSOne's internal review end up siding with creationism? https://t.co/SwvqlDR4As