PLOS ONE editors apologize that language wasn't addressed pre-publication. We're looking into concerns w/ priority. https://t.co/OwYzzoVuYV
Un paper creacionista y de diseño inteligente en PLOSone O_o https://t.co/BwJpAiHWC1
WTF??!!! Un paper creacionista en PLOS!!! https://t.co/BwJpAiqlKt
What is the relation between ""the Creator"" and this study? https://t.co/c4STQGSstA
Tenemos artículo creacionista en PLOS ONE escrito por ¿estadounidenses de origen chino? https://t.co/EMbhpoPB9w
Authors replied to a commenter here: https://t.co/CuBaqISqqK
"The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS ONE abstract!
"Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator's invention." Maybe should have been caught in review? https://t.co/iEUZ6jIrQh
A paper that refers to creative design ... "proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks...” https://t.co/TaGq5tQ5Yx
"..the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator..." - um, what? https://t.co/bYNU9Rxdhf
Dear PLOS One. Get rid of this article and the editor who let it through. https://t.co/TbMYZObkTA
https://t.co/5MnsFFNAPp PLOS One paper on anatomy of human hand credits "the Creator" for making it so well-designed. Huh?