RT @arjundevamar: .@PLOSONE post apology about The Creator debacle - need to move fast to restore credibility https://t.co/AmYPiIyalC https…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @arjundevamar: .@PLOSONE post apology about The Creator debacle - need to move fast to restore credibility https://t.co/AmYPiIyalC https…
RT @aetiology: The fuck, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/RWbXTL3ua7
RT @arjundevamar: .@PLOSONE post apology about The Creator debacle - need to move fast to restore credibility https://t.co/AmYPiIyalC https…
RT @aetiology: The fuck, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/RWbXTL3ua7
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…
.@PLOSONE post apology about The Creator debacle - need to move fast to restore credibility https://t.co/AmYPiIyalC https://t.co/uEIagywFuy
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @aetiology: The fuck, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/RWbXTL3ua7
RT @Lufpa: What to think about the reviewers and editor who allowed: "...indicates...is the proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/J…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
The fuck, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/RWbXTL3ua7
RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…
RT @sbassi: @uadlup @pdenapo ya lo hicieron. https://t.co/7QI6YlCTcy
@uadlup @pdenapo ya lo hicieron. https://t.co/7QI6YlCTcy
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
PLOS ONE editors apologize that language wasn't addressed pre-publication. We're looking into concerns w/ priority. https://t.co/OwYzzoVuYV
RT @Laelaps: "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." WTF, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/kSNX7KW3oN
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
Evidence for a creator in #PLOSONE (read the full abstract): https://t.co/LMppe1YeJX
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvPpjKT
RT @_djli: @hormiga @PLOSONE did you see the author's even funny response? "too miraculous to ..." https://t.co/5c2LReH5a6
Un paper creacionista y de diseño inteligente en PLOSone O_o https://t.co/BwJpAiHWC1
@hormiga @PLOSONE did you see the author's even funny response? "too miraculous to ..." https://t.co/5c2LReH5a6
@PLOSONE You should retract this creationist paper ASSAP https://t.co/BwJpAiqlKt
@dutchscientist @sharmanedit no, the authors did mean Creator as in "God". Read their reply to his comment: https://t.co/1YY4lBE91L
@sharmanedit Also, response from author on comment with article https://t.co/WlgJWp8wSI suggests religious link indeed.
WTF??!!! Un paper creacionista en PLOS!!! https://t.co/BwJpAiqlKt
RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx
RT @JohnUrbanGenome: Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh
RT @paleofreak: Why did you publish a creationist paper, @PLOSONE ? https://t.co/2623anYBQp
@PLOSONE I am rather certain that the Flying Spaghetti Monster has nothing to do with our appendages... https://t.co/dY4dbRQXMi
Why did you publish a creationist paper, @PLOSONE ? https://t.co/2623anYBQp
@sharmanedit I don't think that flies given their response to one of the post-review comments: https://t.co/010bcAG2hj
RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…
What ?! O_o https://t.co/a6LeXomjFt https://t.co/lIOfiEDnKg
RT @brachiofnord: https://t.co/0Hd6Iy1vly Somewhat old article getting traction just now because of "the Creator" @PLOSONE what gives? #han…
@PLOSONE appears to have stepped in it; read the end of the abstract at link below. Face palm time. https://t.co/FqnV65eocs
https://t.co/0Hd6Iy1vly Somewhat old article getting traction just now because of "the Creator" @PLOSONE what gives? #handcreator
RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx
What is the relation between ""the Creator"" and this study? https://t.co/c4STQGSstA
RT @uadlup: Creacionismo en @PLOSONE... Triste ejemplo de que el peer review no es infalible #Creator https://t.co/jzhpxQIVOJ https://t.co/…
RT @paleofreak: Tenemos artículo creacionista en PLOS ONE escrito por ¿estadounidenses de origen chino? https://t.co/EMbhpoPB9w
Tenemos artículo creacionista en PLOS ONE escrito por ¿estadounidenses de origen chino? https://t.co/EMbhpoPB9w
RT @Solof1sincirco: https://t.co/eSrC0rNaSm ¿Artículo creacionista que se ha colado o mala traducción de los autores?
RT @JohnUrbanGenome: Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh
RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…
RT @schneiderleonid: @Neuro_Skeptic hope you and @PLOSONE appreciate my comment: https://t.co/ov6sYaqyvV
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
It's a miracle https://t.co/MnyGRDcPST Hand shows design by Creator HT: @Neuro_Skeptic Or devil sys @schneiderleonid https://t.co/f9W6B4Hozl
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
Seriously @PLOSONE you published this? "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention" https://t.co/pa8wsGiXwa
Journal Club...assemble! "...proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/iYmDU8YxaM https://t.co/FocKoCNvvc
@Neuro_Skeptic hope you and @PLOSONE appreciate my comment: https://t.co/ov6sYaqyvV
RT @JohnUrbanGenome: Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh
RT @mattbenton123: "Our study can confirm..that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" What the s**t @PLOSONE htt…
RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx
RT @uadlup: Creacionismo en @PLOSONE... Triste ejemplo de que el peer review no es infalible #Creator https://t.co/jzhpxQIVOJ https://t.co/…
RT @Laelaps: "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." WTF, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/kSNX7KW3oN
RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
Authors replied to a commenter here: https://t.co/CuBaqISqqK
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …
"The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS ONE abstract!
@Macungo https://t.co/0ppqmDudzi ojo con el abstract
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @mattbenton123: "Our study can confirm..that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" What the s**t @PLOSONE htt…