Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living

RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…

RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…

Evidence for a creator in #PLOSONE (read the full abstract): https://t.co/LMppe1YeJX

RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…

The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvPpjKT

https://t.co/cuGglBBBGy #twitciencia https://t.co/Ilv5aZl4H7

RT @_djli: @hormiga @PLOSONE did you see the author's even funny response? "too miraculous to ..." https://t.co/5c2LReH5a6

Un paper creacionista y de diseño inteligente en PLOSone O_o https://t.co/BwJpAiHWC1

@hormiga @PLOSONE did you see the author's even funny response? "too miraculous to ..." https://t.co/5c2LReH5a6

@PLOSONE You should retract this creationist paper ASSAP https://t.co/BwJpAiqlKt

@dutchscientist @sharmanedit no, the authors did mean Creator as in "God". Read their reply to his comment: https://t.co/1YY4lBE91L

@sharmanedit Also, response from author on comment with article https://t.co/WlgJWp8wSI suggests religious link indeed.

WTF??!!! Un paper creacionista en PLOS!!! https://t.co/BwJpAiqlKt

RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx

RT @JohnUrbanGenome: Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh

RT @paleofreak: Why did you publish a creationist paper, @PLOSONE ? https://t.co/2623anYBQp

@PLOSONE I am rather certain that the Flying Spaghetti Monster has nothing to do with our appendages... https://t.co/dY4dbRQXMi

Why did you publish a creationist paper, @PLOSONE ? https://t.co/2623anYBQp

@sharmanedit I don't think that flies given their response to one of the post-review comments: https://t.co/010bcAG2hj

RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…

What ?! O_o https://t.co/a6LeXomjFt https://t.co/lIOfiEDnKg

RT @brachiofnord: https://t.co/0Hd6Iy1vly Somewhat old article getting traction just now because of "the Creator" @PLOSONE what gives? #han…

@PLOSONE appears to have stepped in it; read the end of the abstract at link below. Face palm time. https://t.co/FqnV65eocs

https://t.co/0Hd6Iy1vly Somewhat old article getting traction just now because of "the Creator" @PLOSONE what gives? #handcreator

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…

RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx

What is the relation between ""the Creator"" and this study? https://t.co/c4STQGSstA

RT @uadlup: Creacionismo en @PLOSONE... Triste ejemplo de que el peer review no es infalible #Creator https://t.co/jzhpxQIVOJ https://t.co/…

Tenemos artículo creacionista en PLOS ONE escrito por ¿estadounidenses de origen chino? https://t.co/EMbhpoPB9w

RT @Solof1sincirco: https://t.co/eSrC0rNaSm ¿Artículo creacionista que se ha colado o mala traducción de los autores?

RT @JohnUrbanGenome: Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh

RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…

RT @schneiderleonid: @Neuro_Skeptic hope you and @PLOSONE appreciate my comment: https://t.co/ov6sYaqyvV

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

It's a miracle https://t.co/MnyGRDcPST Hand shows design by Creator HT: @Neuro_Skeptic Or devil sys @schneiderleonid https://t.co/f9W6B4Hozl

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

Seriously @PLOSONE you published this? "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention" https://t.co/pa8wsGiXwa

Journal Club...assemble! "...proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/iYmDU8YxaM https://t.co/FocKoCNvvc

@Neuro_Skeptic hope you and @PLOSONE appreciate my comment: https://t.co/ov6sYaqyvV

RT @JohnUrbanGenome: Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh

RT @mattbenton123: "Our study can confirm..that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" What the s**t @PLOSONE htt…

RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx

RT @uadlup: Creacionismo en @PLOSONE... Triste ejemplo de que el peer review no es infalible #Creator https://t.co/jzhpxQIVOJ https://t.co/…

RT @Laelaps: "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." WTF, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/kSNX7KW3oN

RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

Authors replied to a commenter here: https://t.co/CuBaqISqqK

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS …

"The biomechanical characteristic of [human hands] is the proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/XOUw8ZXGnH A PLoS ONE abstract!

@Macungo https://t.co/0ppqmDudzi ojo con el abstract

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

RT @mattbenton123: "Our study can confirm..that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" What the s**t @PLOSONE htt…

RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx

RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo

PLOS ONE publishes an article claiming that hands are "the proper design by the Creator" #scienceWin https://t.co/eFfwfLNAfC

RT @rhskraus: How is this possible @PLOSONE @PLOS? "...biomechanical characteristic [...] is the proper design by the Creator..." https://t…

RT @mattbenton123: "Our study can confirm..that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" What the s**t @PLOSONE htt…

A paper that refers to creative design ... "proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks...” https://t.co/TaGq5tQ5Yx

RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…

RT @uadlup: Creacionismo en @PLOSONE... Triste ejemplo de que el peer review no es infalible #Creator https://t.co/jzhpxQIVOJ https://t.co/…

RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD

@christophjoyce comment from ArthurDent makes it all better https://t.co/9OOzAQbRN9

RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…

"..the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator..." - um, what? https://t.co/bYNU9Rxdhf

RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…

RT @rhskraus: How is this possible @PLOSONE @PLOS? "...biomechanical characteristic [...] is the proper design by the Creator..." https://t…

Creationism sneaks in science by the hand of @PLOSONE #badreview https://t.co/y8YkId7utM

Dear PLOS One. Get rid of this article and the editor who let it through. https://t.co/TbMYZObkTA

RT @ScholarlyChickn: It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers. https://t.co/kgHEQHZno3 https://t.co/ZDQba1Lucx

RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…

RT @CT_Bergstrom: And it matches the shape of a banana (https://t.co/wFUuOYtepn) so perfectly! https://t.co/i93QcOgKR8 https://t.co/oIMmyw…

RT @WyoWeeds: @mbeisen @jomcinerney Check out the 3rd comment though. Convincing argument. https://t.co/SOU0IqAbOa

#PLOSONE: "...is the proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/IJq6XWGIGB It has to be a joke @PLOSONE

RT @Protohedgehog: 'Biomechanical features of hands are the proper design by the Creator' https://t.co/0zDSysFwAm I'm sorry, I thought this…

https://t.co/5MnsFFNAPp PLOS One paper on anatomy of human hand credits "the Creator" for making it so well-designed. Huh?

OK..... https://t.co/SF6xJE9EDm https://t.co/L2CztXGfWe

RT @Laelaps: "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." WTF, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/kSNX7KW3oN

RT @BobOHara: .@jomcinerney @scholarlykitchn I rather like ArthurDent's comment: https://t.co/zw57Vg8Evl

RT @BobOHara: .@jomcinerney @scholarlykitchn I rather like ArthurDent's comment: https://t.co/zw57Vg8Evl

RT @JohnRHutchinson: Human hand: tool not of the Kreator but of the dEvil: (amusing comment-) https://t.co/jZHBonikJo

Human hand: tool not of the Kreator but of the dEvil: (amusing comment-) https://t.co/jZHBonikJo

RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…

"Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." WTF, @PLOSONE? https://t.co/kSNX7KW3oN

RT @ArtemPankin: mockery of the #PLoSOne article (seriously?) implying divine intervention in the human hand design https://t.co/q7FlsQU42Y…

RT @girlborealis: Wow @PLOSONE, you published a MS that shows the hand "is the proper design by the Creator". #PeerReviewFail https://t.co/…

RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD

jajajaja! no fue el creador, fue el diablo! https://t.co/rELSPJC5cL

RT @GaboTuitero: THIS --> "...is the proper design by the Creator" O.o https://t.co/BcNs2mBCSP via @cowlactica cc @edyong209 https://t.co/8…

"Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention" grande, @PLOSONE https://t.co/uplp4lveCy

RT @Jason_Macrander: Creationist paper gets through @PLOSONE and this comment is the perfect response: https://t.co/lEqHgGaxzB

Wow @PLOSONE, you published a MS that shows the hand "is the proper design by the Creator". #PeerReviewFail https://t.co/k6XzFLpecq

RT @uadlup: Creacionismo en @PLOSONE... Triste ejemplo de que el peer review no es infalible #Creator https://t.co/jzhpxQIVOJ https://t.co/…