What to think about the reviewers and editor who allowed: "...indicates...is the proper design by the Creator..." https://t.co/JFIOG7ysPM
A fine response to a Creationist article that made it into the Public Library of Science journal: https://t.co/Ree3WXwRbH
Seriously? Peer reviewed paper cites “design by the Creator” in explanation for hand physiology https://t.co/W72O8OWPgq
'Biomechanical features of hands are the proper design by the Creator' https://t.co/0zDSysFwAm I'm sorry, I thought this was science?
A propos Qualität, mal kurz zur Wissenschaft. Heute: Die Hand. https://t.co/QSMrf45PGf
"Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/EREkgelUJo" @JosephMkRoberts
Read this !! https://t.co/Y2BJkWevq9 editor/editorial office should resign/be sacked. Or just remove word "science" from a science journal
Creationism in PLoS ONE ...? WITAF? https://t.co/qbUVht2ELh