Remember #CreatorGate? The authors responded to it, and it doesn't look good for @PLOSONE https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl https://t.co/bxFzqkleZx
@SFriedScientist Did you see this..? https://t.co/obHaRzHsbl (Don't want to drag it on, but seems we were right!)
RT @WyoWeeds: Ummm... What's up @PLOSONE? Proof of the Creator? https://t.co/k1hdPxWJw9 https://t.co/VDZSptisGD
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
RT @HotPaperTweet: 【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https:/…
【科学出版】【撤回】「人間の手が精巧にできているのは『創造主』のおかげ」と主張する論文がプロスワンに掲載された。反響を呼び、撤回へ。論文著者が英語に不慣れで表現 誤用か。エディターは要旨さえきちんと読んでいないのかと批判も。 https://t.co/VUZOumhfBO
RT @eigenfactor: #HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https…
#PLOSONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/ZSlIehBZ0x
RT @eigenfactor: #HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https…
#HandOfGod authors respond to the @PLOSONE retraction of their paper. I still want to know if they'll get a refund. https://t.co/DEJ12RygRh
RT @BryanJFischer: Before PC Nazis censor it, scientific paper three times says human hand evidence of a Creator. https://t.co/SSBbBNKQJH
#PLOSONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/L8JEbbf237
Reviewers asleep on the job: https://t.co/BHylnPgC7A #UDKAAP
今、もっともアツい炎上論文。しかし、 "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." って、凄いなこれ。 / “PLOS O…” https://t.co/wVci8WdexL
@cecidiprinzio te acordás del paper de PlosOne? Se retractaron, no se si lo viste. https://t.co/MKuJKJwPJZ
RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA
Publicar por publicidad o publicar con criterio científico, un ejemplo de lo que sucede en algunas revistas de... https://t.co/VzOrM0891a
@PLOSONE This retraction is a shame. It disrespects the authors https://t.co/ziMYc1MmOK
I call this Victory. Thanks #plosone to your efficient move ! #CreatorIsNotScience #lemonde https://t.co/HBg2HfdLYA https://t.co/rhqUgpD9sP
RT @AlexGalvezPol: Hands' architecture is the proper design by the Creator to perform daily tasks. In PLOS one: the CREATOR awakens. https:…
RT @BugsWormsNBats: Editorial quality control and open-access value-for-money called into question once again @PLOSONE https://t.co/ieEIRqs…
A recent paper in PLOS ONE study made reference to a 'CREATOR', and about the overall rationale and findings of... https://t.co/0G90WPX6W1
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
Bueno de un Creador (así con mayúscula). Veanlo, esta interesante https://t.co/24l5gSpT0L
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @gonyebra: @arambaut They claim they meant "Nature" instead of "Creator" - English is so confusing :D https://t.co/cxD3p2Fype https://t.…
RT @gonyebra: @arambaut They claim they meant "Nature" instead of "Creator" - English is so confusing :D https://t.co/cxD3p2Fype https://t.…
RT @gonyebra: @arambaut They claim they meant "Nature" instead of "Creator" - English is so confusing :D https://t.co/cxD3p2Fype https://t.…
Who is to blame?, bad editorial work? bad peer reviewing? https://t.co/QVd39DwXca, at the end of the day, science watches over itself!
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @mariodalmaso: ...readers raised concerns about language in the article that makes references to a 'Creator'... https://t.co/GMO7SedP4r
A translation error? Definitely a human one, if any, https://t.co/TokAuzCrCH
RT @cdanielcadena: ah, ellos pensaron que "creator" quería decir "nature (result of evolution)". pfff @PLOSONE https://t.co/VftSWH5gLf http…
Twitter "peer review" got this paper retracted in less than a week after it went viral. Bad press motivates action. https://t.co/TkJ8jNkAjy
RT @cdanielcadena: ah, ellos pensaron que "creator" quería decir "nature (result of evolution)". pfff @PLOSONE https://t.co/VftSWH5gLf http…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
Science and evolution clash PLOS ONE journal pulls https://t.co/lEEGBFNulR scientific exploration of a creators hand https://t.co/nMzSCyKged
Creationism in science https://t.co/VheVbtktJk
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
...readers raised concerns about language in the article that makes references to a 'Creator'... https://t.co/GMO7SedP4r
Academic censorship. Do you think it is warranted or unwarranted? https://t.co/e1cRiKciNm
RT @lucaborger: Less quantity & speed, proper Editors & #peerreview (pre & post) = less #handofgod? Lessons from @PLOSONE debacle. https://…
the tone of comments on the #creatorgate paper seem to change after its retraction. in either case plosone lost many https://t.co/orEIGRlljD
@mattstat Quick! you can still print and save--readable even with "retracted" stamped on it. https://t.co/Q5APf57QiP
Nota curiosa. Estos chinos mapearon el funcionamiento d la mano y, para su desgracia, descubrieron que está diseñada https://t.co/pyvFtvopD6
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
@DeepFriedDNA Maybe the student would like to publish her/his essay in PLoS One? Like these guys ... https://t.co/OtSv6ZYcko
PLOS ONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living HERESY ?! https://t.co/nsmVqgkQXY
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
#PLoSONE retracted this article b/c authors make references to a 'Creator.' #noscientificrationale. Thoughts? https://t.co/ChBsOQLwK0
RT @Inge_Kersbergen: How did this get through review? @PLOSONE paper credits "the Creator" for human hand coordination... https://t.co/JnPI…
When readers reject a peer reviewed paper! https://t.co/ZBTENW639x https://t.co/lRul3rXKpM https://t.co/lKk5mDPvaG https://t.co/5QrYUdnVUW
RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA
RT @Protohedgehog: Retraction at #Creatorgate. Still unclear what was wrong with the editorial/review process. https://t.co/DPJHwqWAo2 http…
Another #plos one editorial mistake! https://t.co/fjYYKIyddZ it is since been retracted
#HandOfGod finally retracted! https://t.co/HISO6YVv0V
RT @centinel5051: A la publicación científica online Plos One se le cuela un paper sobre el diseño inteligente de la mano. https://t.co/Ek7…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
La ciencia no es infalible; pero asume y corrige sus errores públicamente. Lo opuesto exacto de cualquier iglesia https://t.co/tCGnOapJAn
RT @ahmadpeik: #Retracted #PLOSONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination https://t.co/RQ3nxf1AE8 #Creator #designedbyCreator …
RT @PLOS: New: @PLOSONE Eds statement of intent to retract #creatorgate paper: https://t.co/dnfVPuYFoT
Apparently all one needs to call into question pseudoscience is to lob pseudoscientific nonsense back in return: https://t.co/xtJ6sfH2YH
@davidimiller https://t.co/ncgfbh5RGC - so methods seem OK.
RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA
RT @BryanJFischer: Before PC Nazis censor it, scientific paper three times says human hand evidence of a Creator. https://t.co/SSBbBNKQJH
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
#PLOSONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/dI5CFfAiO7
Published here anyone? https://t.co/kXVmT8VfAR
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
PLOS ONE publishes article with references to a Creator. How do we fix this valuable journal? https://t.co/HTT2Aq0Ghb
RT @koichi_kawakami: PLoS Oneが宗教誌になってしまった?! 手の構造に関する論文中:"design by the Creator" "the Creator’s invention" https://t.co/Bbr8IvhlHH https://t…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
Bello les quedó 😡😡😡 RT @PLOSONE: Apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper https://t.co/LR58A9sRkj
Bello les quedó 😡😡😡 RT @PLOSONE: Apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper https://t.co/guVgbQgDxn
RT @pedromsmonteiro: Is #PLOSONE suppporting #pseudoscience? Article abstract says:"...design by the Creator..." #science #religion https:/…
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @adamthomasford: Invoking the Creator in the discussion,wither parsimony @PLOSONE ?!? https://t.co/jMunpHqo7B
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
#Retracted #PLOSONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination https://t.co/RQ3nxf1AE8 #Creator #designedbyCreator #HandOfGod
RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA
@PLOSONE "we conclude... the proper design by the Creator for dexterous performance..." https://t.co/BC6T8QgErs Kudos PLoS for retraction!
RT @koichi_kawakami: PLoS Oneが宗教誌になってしまった?! 手の構造に関する論文中:"design by the Creator" "the Creator’s invention" https://t.co/Bbr8IvhlHH https://t…
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA
Great #article that should not have been retracted.. #Science https://t.co/CABnd2Ha51 #peerreview #PLOSONE #HumanHand #CommonSense #Evidence
RT @BryanJFischer: Before PC Nazis censor it, scientific paper three times says human hand evidence of a Creator. https://t.co/SSBbBNKQJH