I am usually a fan of PLoS One (as a peer-reviewed alternative to arXiv), but this gives me MAJOR pause https://t.co/SLoq7zCUzz ?!?!?!?!?!?!
how can plosONE accept a paper in which they talk about "The Creator". What kind of Science is this? https://t.co/twmWAECUMw #shame
And today in "how on earth did this get past peer review?", this: https://t.co/Y48u69LT6l
PLOS ONE: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living https://t.co/Bh90D3NqaU
PLOS ONE: "Our internal review revealed that peer review did not adequately evaluate several aspects of the work." https://t.co/lMp66nSIRW
RT @ButlerLabBham: The authors of *that* PLOS ONE paper clarify that they are not creationists. Still a spectacular editorial fail: https:/…