RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
RT @PLOSONE: Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
Update: PLOS ONE apologizes for the errors and oversight leading to the publication of this paper. https://t.co/tqlvWtUB93
PLOS1 #Creatorgate paper being retracted https://t.co/JNd1lqbWLm
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Several @PLOSONE editors and authors are pledging to boycott the journal unless it deals with #Creatorgate swiftly https…
Un paper da creditos al "creador" por el diseño de la mano humana. https://t.co/9KV4W427RI @GaboTuitero @DanielNorero @AlexisRebdo
RT @dawnbazely: Following complaints about #IntelligentDesign article, @PLOS is investigating https://t.co/YDU8WjWbsm HT @AMCELL https://t.…
RT @nesospiza: #IntelligentDesign does not belong in a scientific journal, @PLOSONE! https://t.co/asNbAxykjL https://t.co/S5CnXXzWHj
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
RT @marc_rr: The @PLOSONE staff has reacted to the “Creator” paper: https://t.co/HNdY87Jztg Fast & transparent reaction https://t.co/qEPlvP…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Several @PLOSONE editors and authors are pledging to boycott the journal unless it deals with #Creatorgate swiftly https…
https://t.co/GyF3ImGWJJ Guys, brace yourselves, but it turns out the open access model might have some flaws https://t.co/8VpfYnUwM8
With papers such as this https://t.co/95yDpOoZaA getting through peer review, think twice before submitting to @PLOSONE
Creacionismo y diseño inteligente en artículo publicado en PlosOne! https://t.co/P1erJcAGhw
RT @AlexDunhill: Have @PLOSONE just published a creation "science" article? Good Lord! https://t.co/ocfCcaMkus
RT @HochTwit: The Creator appears to have achieved the proper design FOLLOWING evolution @PLOSONE https://t.co/7Bhdr9rfa7 https://t.co/ZDRI…
PLoS published evidence defence of creationism. Huh?! https://t.co/2DBiv11sK1
RT @AlquierThierry: @neurophy @canna_brain Check authors response...hum, they even used a capital C ! https://t.co/Ceev6COUWs
RT @tiagopeixoto: Creationist paper in @PLOSONE. Sloppy and shameful. Nonexistent peer review and editing... https://t.co/cvr3eiBGyI
@neurophy @canna_brain Check authors response...hum, they even used a capital C ! https://t.co/Ceev6COUWs
RT @HochTwit: The Creator appears to have achieved the proper design FOLLOWING evolution @PLOSONE https://t.co/7Bhdr9rfa7 https://t.co/ZDRI…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Several @PLOSONE editors and authors are pledging to boycott the journal unless it deals with #Creatorgate swiftly https…
https://t.co/PIc2vU2xzr What "scientific" journal does "The Creator" read to see how his/her "intelligent design" of the hand is doing?
RT @HelenaMatute: El paper de @PLOSONE del que todo el mundo habla hoy. Diseño inteligente de la mano.. ¿Cómo se ha colado tal cosa? https:…
https://t.co/IRgzY6RNOC What the....?!
Yet another example of poor editorial judgement. No one thought to ask if the poor authors really meant 'creator'? https://t.co/DSTtGIVyeo
RT @WoodpointIrwin: PLOS One has a problem. Check out the abstract and comments on this article: https://t.co/UQFEtFdtUX
El creacionismo se cuela @PLOSONE https://t.co/rqtP9Hcjso
Apparently PLOS One thinks there's a "creator"; could science sink lower? https://t.co/lUITNO7rmd
The journal PLOS ONE published a scientific article that makes direct reference to a creator and intelligent design. https://t.co/RWr750xHH7
RT @randal_olson: Article suggesting #IntelligentDesign of the human hand gets published in @PLOSONE. Wow... https://t.co/hBKd6YlY90 http…
RT @AhmedArslan: Chinese & US scientists r promoting"The Creator"in their latest work, thx to @PLOSONE & #RIPsci @RichardDawkins https://t…
Chinese & US scientists r promoting"The Creator"in their latest work, thx to @PLOSONE & #RIPsci @RichardDawkins https://t.co/f6UrWG7GoU
Look for "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention" WOW! https://t.co/kag3KL6mMW
Creationism in a peer reviewed journal ?!?!? @PLOSONE https://t.co/rVSjYA8jJJ
Trouble over at PLOS ONE with use of the 'C word' near the end of the abstract. See also reader comments. https://t.co/008iQKq1QT
#thankthecreator https://t.co/p5faUOr7o5 How did this get past peer review
RT @pedrobek: La rta del staff de @PLOSONE x paper del "Creator", indignación de los cient y rta de autor https://t.co/DqOzG4OtpH https://t…
RT @HochTwit: The Creator appears to have achieved the proper design FOLLOWING evolution @PLOSONE https://t.co/7Bhdr9rfa7 https://t.co/ZDRI…
La rta del staff de @PLOSONE x paper del "Creator", indignación de los cient y rta de autor https://t.co/DqOzG4OtpH https://t.co/Rw74RKOjuc
Never fond of @PLOSONE reviewing process anyway but this is the nail in the coffin...https://t.co/JpjTx2bNGG
RT @ManuelPorcar1: "The Creator" is acknowledged in the abstract of a PLOS One paper. Shouldn't HE be among the authors? https://t.co/sDrd6…
In case you think that @PLOSONE is a respectable journal, here's evidence otherwise: https://t.co/ZsXDaVjKyr #UnintelligentDesign
RT @randal_olson: Article suggesting #IntelligentDesign of the human hand gets published in @PLOSONE. Wow... https://t.co/hBKd6YlY90 http…
RT @randal_olson: Article suggesting #IntelligentDesign of the human hand gets published in @PLOSONE. Wow... https://t.co/hBKd6YlY90 http…
RT @tachisto: https://t.co/SQoXGU9FD0 わー、科学論文にCreatorとか書いちゃった件、コメントに著者登場して余計に炎上してるー
PLOS ONE publishes a biomechanics study concluding "proper design by the Creator".... oopsies! https://t.co/NstOKx4HSO
@kpobergfell also see the revision/clarification: https://t.co/XwpM1Od1pB
PLOS ONE article suggests the existence of a "creator" to explain the complexity of nature https://t.co/o4xrvTFfeq WTF!??!
https://t.co/SQoXGU9FD0 わー、科学論文にCreatorとか書いちゃった件、コメントに著者登場して余計に炎上してるー
#PLOSONE: published an article on intelligent design https://t.co/UxB83GdmbO
Use of intelligent design creationism for explaining human anatomy in a @PLOSONE paper - Good job editors&reviewers https://t.co/Noef0Rb15Z
PLOS One has a problem. Check out the abstract and comments on this article: https://t.co/UQFEtFdtUX
'muscles and articulations is the proper design by the Creator' https://t.co/xOcRnbhoHU ¡¿what do you mean, @PLOSONE?!
RT @LegalizeBrain: Big pb with @PLOS ONE paper mentionning "The Creator" in abstract : https://t.co/DuQ1pdj0U7
RT @adambyron: A creator of the article replies: https://t.co/GJP2psZsFF https://t.co/NM6flJ5aP0
RT @randal_olson: Article suggesting #IntelligentDesign of the human hand gets published in @PLOSONE. Wow... https://t.co/hBKd6YlY90 http…
Sooo, PlosONE totally published an ID paper... Sigh. https://t.co/Weg6No8n4D
#handofgod altmetrics are through the roof. https://t.co/QsgBoFtmIH
RT @adambyron: A creator of the article replies: https://t.co/GJP2psZsFF https://t.co/NM6flJ5aP0
RT @Inge_Kersbergen: How did this get through review? @PLOSONE paper credits "the Creator" for human hand coordination... https://t.co/JnPI…
A creator of the article replies: https://t.co/GJP2psZsFF https://t.co/NM6flJ5aP0
RT @eoinocarroll: How on Earth did this rubbish get past peer review?https://t.co/PpnNqdulEZ
RT @jomcinerney: Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal https://t.co/AJexYjewoo
How on Earth did this rubbish get past peer review?https://t.co/PpnNqdulEZ
#PLOSONE: This journal has "redefined" the meaning of "peer-review" https://t.co/tJjVV7vQxB.
炎上してるww https://t.co/7a52mTYCAX
RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA
RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA
PLoS One is now publishing papers where God is given credit for human anatomy cc @neurophy https://t.co/ZyMVyCkTwj https://t.co/ASR6Hd26Yk
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Several @PLOSONE editors and authors are pledging to boycott the journal unless it deals with #Creatorgate swiftly https…
This PlosOne Creationist hand drama is amazing!... https://t.co/gXfGcPgBFh
Why is PLOS one open access? "Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention." https://t.co/5qSJOVlPDS
RT @HelenaMatute: El paper de @PLOSONE del que todo el mundo habla hoy. Diseño inteligente de la mano.. ¿Cómo se ha colado tal cosa? https:…
RT @centinel5051: A la publicación científica online Plos One se le cuela un paper sobre el diseño inteligente de la mano. https://t.co/Ek7…
Er, well this'll make Discussion sections easier to write @PLOS paper namechecks the Creator https://t.co/WMUreoPvnY https://t.co/LhYbffxIMF
専門外で内容はわからないのですが、コメントではCreator は nature (result of evolution)の意味らしいです。 peer-reviewを通ったのが不思議。 https://t.co/juQJMnG3Dy https://t.co/pIPcNdtKWY
All going crazy @PLOSONE as a reference to "The Creator" gets through the editorial process. Paper seems dubious too https://t.co/nE5ru2G3cV
A la publicación científica online Plos One se le cuela un paper sobre el diseño inteligente de la mano. https://t.co/Ek7zDY9CJ0
RT @randal_olson: Article suggesting #IntelligentDesign of the human hand gets published in @PLOSONE. Wow... https://t.co/hBKd6YlY90 http…
wth @PLOSONE ? "the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator" #CreatorInPLOS https://t.co/aNXY3ttexJ
「この明白な機能的関係は、筋肉と関節をつないでいる腱の構造の生体力学的な特性が、日常のさまざまな動作を快適に行なうための、創造主による正しいデザインであることを示している。」 …うーん、これはちょっと科学論文としてアウトかな。 https://t.co/IeysM7iNqQ
Peer review went really wrong here @plosone. Or probably just did not go at al https://t.co/oDIZoMzOtI
#PLoSOne I figured the "creator" thing was an english translation issue. ppl get your panties out of a twist now? https://t.co/YncIxZVgex
RT @rjgeller: 科学雑誌PLOS Oneは大失敗した。科学論部分中「Creator」 、つまり「神様」という宗教的表現、の使用を見逃した。炎上中。#Creatorgate https://t.co/mrk8WiO0mA
[阅读] 国内有人发表学术文章研究一通之后说是人手忒复杂,应是上帝弄出来的: https://t.co/eratAu6rsF https://t.co/sHqIXWsi64