PLoS ONE announced that the paper will be retracted: https://t.co/3CCakuUkZ1
For those wondering what I'm talking about: It seems that the Creator had a lot to do with designing the hand. https://t.co/lNLnn3Dw1R
RT @ButlerLabBham: The authors of *that* PLOS ONE paper clarify that they are not creationists. Still a spectacular editorial fail: https:/…
PLOS published (since retracted) paper claiming that hands are a "design by the Creator"! Somebodies getting fired...https://t.co/N7Yol56y24
PLOS One publishes, then retracts, article with "Creator" in abstract. Comments are delightful. https://t.co/w8rJNcofT6
Hand of God study now retracted by Plosone https://t.co/agZDvtlr2s
PLOS ONE, your source for studies about the "proper design by the Creator." https://t.co/mJ8qOSdLnz
That PLOSONE paper to be retracted. Some sort of record? https://t.co/LRsrSN75Ca
https://t.co/l3zLjBO9Rz Thank god, PLOS One retracted a contreversial article mentioning 'A Creator'. C'mon and shake my hand buddy ...
editors need this attitude on psychobabble: https://t.co/2sRiGu8yCb "Retract this article or I resign as an Editor". no more cowardice!
Somebody forgot to tell the Chinese that they're not supposed to mention the Creator. :) Good for the Chinese. https://t.co/JIsUetNtiB
Hand of God?? https://t.co/qsgCFNLOzu