↓ Skip to main content

Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
138 news outlets
blogs
26 blogs
policy
11 policy sources
twitter
1209 X users
facebook
35 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
9 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
611 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1131 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.h6704
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Arantxa Colchero, Barry M Popkin, Juan A Rivera, Shu Wen Ng

Abstract

 What has been the effect on purchases of beverages from stores in Mexico one year after implementation of the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages?  In this observational study the authors used data on the purchase of beverages in Mexico from January 2012 to December 2014 from an unbalanced panel of 6253 households providing 205 112 observations in 53 cities with more than 50 000 inhabitants. To test whether the post-tax trend in purchases was significantly different from the pretax trend, the authors used a difference in difference fixed effects model, which adjusts for both macroeconomic variables that can affect the purchase of beverages over time, and pre-existing trends. The variables used in the analysis included demographic information on household composition (age and sex of household members) and socioeconomic status (low, middle, and high). The authors compared the predicted volumes (mL/capita/day) of taxed and untaxed beverages purchased in 2014-the observed post-tax period-with the estimated volumes that would have been purchased if the tax had not been implemented (counterfactual) based on pretax trends.  Relative to the counterfactual in 2014, purchases of taxed beverages decreased by an average of 6% (-12 mL/capita/day), and decreased at an increasing rate up to a 12% decline by December 2014. All three socioeconomic groups reduced purchases of taxed beverages, but reductions were higher among the households of low socioeconomic status, averaging a 9% decline during 2014, and up to a 17% decrease by December 2014 compared with pretax trends. Purchases of untaxed beverages were 4% (36 mL/capita/day) higher than the counterfactual, mainly driven by an increase in purchases of bottled plain water.  The tax on sugar sweetened beverages was associated with reductions in purchases of taxed beverages and increases in purchases of untaxed beverages. Continued monitoring is needed to understand purchases longer term, potential substitutions, and health implications.  This work was supported by grants from Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and by the Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública and the Carolina Population Center. The authors have no competing interests. No additional data are available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,209 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 1121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 274 24%
Student > Bachelor 181 16%
Researcher 129 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 8%
Student > Postgraduate 51 5%
Other 143 13%
Unknown 259 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 218 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 135 12%
Social Sciences 103 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 80 7%
Other 180 16%
Unknown 329 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1971. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,788
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#128
of 64,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34
of 402,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 920 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 920 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.