You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve sheath to detect raised intracranial pressure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, September 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc7006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Geeraerts, Virginia FJ Newcombe, Jonathan P Coles, Maria Giulia Abate, Iain E Perkes, Peter JA Hutchinson, Jo G Outtrim, Dot A Chatfield, David K Menon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Benin | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 209 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 39 | 18% |
Researcher | 26 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 9% |
Other | 55 | 25% |
Unknown | 39 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 50% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 7% |
Engineering | 11 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Unknown | 57 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,167,893
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,432
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,942
of 102,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.