You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Ancient Egyptian Scribes Dealt with Line-ends
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.5356/jorient.53.161 |
| Authors |
Masakatsu NAGAI |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,614,583
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
#35
of 213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,800
of 175,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them