↓ Skip to main content

A plea for standards in reporting data collected by animal-borne electronic devices

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 133)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A plea for standards in reporting data collected by animal-borne electronic devices
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40317-015-0096-x
Authors

Hamish A. Campbell, Ferdi Urbano, Sarah Davidson, Holger Dettki, Francesca Cagnacci

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Belize 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Researcher 12 26%
Unspecified 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 54%
Environmental Science 10 22%
Unspecified 9 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#504,980
of 13,505,738 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#13
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,211
of 362,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,505,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.