↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous Multi-plane Imaging of Neural Circuits

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
45 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
536 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous Multi-plane Imaging of Neural Circuits
Published in
Neuron, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weijian Yang, Jae-eun Kang Miller, Luis Carrillo-Reid, Eftychios Pnevmatikakis, Liam Paninski, Rafael Yuste, Darcy S. Peterka

Abstract

Recording the activity of large populations of neurons is an important step toward understanding the emergent function of neural circuits. Here we present a simple holographic method to simultaneously perform two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal populations across multiple areas and layers of mouse cortex in vivo. We use prior knowledge of neuronal locations, activity sparsity, and a constrained nonnegative matrix factorization algorithm to extract signals from neurons imaged simultaneously and located in different focal planes or fields of view. Our laser multiplexing approach is simple and fast, and could be used as a general method to image the activity of neural circuits in three dimensions across multiple areas in the brain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 3%
Germany 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 503 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 185 35%
Researcher 129 24%
Student > Bachelor 30 6%
Student > Master 29 5%
Student > Postgraduate 26 5%
Other 90 17%
Unknown 47 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 153 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 28%
Engineering 70 13%
Physics and Astronomy 51 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 2%
Other 45 8%
Unknown 54 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#716,145
of 17,960,381 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#1,542
of 8,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,708
of 378,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#41
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,960,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.