↓ Skip to main content

Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in ScienceOpen Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
18 blogs
twitter
324 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
327 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
564 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness
Published in
ScienceOpen Research, January 2016
DOI 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.aetbzc.v1
Authors

Anne Boring, Kellie Ottoboni, Philip B. Stark

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 324 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Canada 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 544 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 16%
Researcher 73 13%
Professor 50 9%
Student > Master 46 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 43 8%
Other 154 27%
Unknown 106 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 101 18%
Psychology 56 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 7%
Engineering 27 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 24 4%
Other 183 32%
Unknown 132 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 593. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#39,634
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from ScienceOpen Research
#1
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#514
of 402,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ScienceOpen Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them