↓ Skip to main content

The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1576 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2679 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene
Published in
Science, January 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aad2622
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin N Waters, Jan Zalasiewicz, Colin Summerhayes, Anthony D Barnosky, Clément Poirier, Agnieszka Gałuszka, Alejandro Cearreta, Matt Edgeworth, Erle C Ellis, Michael Ellis, Catherine Jeandel, Reinhold Leinfelder, J R McNeill, Daniel deB Richter, Will Steffen, James Syvitski, Davor Vidas, Michael Wagreich, Mark Williams, An Zhisheng, Jacques Grinevald, Eric Odada, Naomi Oreskes, Alexander P Wolfe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 721 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,679 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 <1%
Brazil 10 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Italy 9 <1%
France 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Other 25 <1%
Unknown 2585 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 510 19%
Researcher 409 15%
Student > Master 375 14%
Student > Bachelor 325 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 129 5%
Other 404 15%
Unknown 527 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 568 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 464 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 368 14%
Social Sciences 162 6%
Arts and Humanities 73 3%
Other 402 15%
Unknown 642 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,036
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Science
#220
of 83,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 402,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 1,171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.