↓ Skip to main content

Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004180.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Bunn, Geraldine Byrne, Sally Kendall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 2%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 391 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 19%
Researcher 47 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 10%
Other 34 8%
Student > Bachelor 34 8%
Other 83 20%
Unknown 92 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 149 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 14%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Psychology 14 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 110 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,576,727
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,356
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,793
of 60,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.