↓ Skip to main content

Incentive spirometry for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in upper abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incentive spirometry for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in upper abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006058.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo do Nascimento Junior, Norma SP Módolo, Sílvia Andrade, Michele MF Guimarães, Leandro G Braz, Regina El Dib

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Portugal 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 235 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 20%
Student > Bachelor 47 19%
Other 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Other 81 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 24%
Unspecified 30 12%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 20 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,694,479
of 12,661,713 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,324
of 10,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,535
of 353,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,661,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.