↓ Skip to main content

Noninfectious uveitis in the Asia–Pacific region

Overview of attention for article published in Eye, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Noninfectious uveitis in the Asia–Pacific region
Published in
Eye, October 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41433-018-0223-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yung-Ray Hsu, Jerry Chien-Chieh Huang, Yong Tao, Toshikatsu Kaburaki, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Tai-Chi Lin, Chih-Chien Hsu, Shih-Hwa Chiou, De-Kuang Hwang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 60%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,340,309
of 15,068,119 outputs
Outputs from Eye
#191
of 2,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,247
of 272,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye
#6
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,068,119 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.