You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response: Commentary: Toward a more physiologically and evolutionarily relevant definition of metal hyperaccumulation in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.01252 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric W. Goolsby, Chase M. Mason |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,337,507
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,938
of 21,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,841
of 396,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#163
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.