You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-018-2888-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tianjing Li, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Nicole Fusco, Hwanhee Hong, Kay Dickersin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,462,378
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,152
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,053
of 353,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.