↓ Skip to main content

Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
155 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
509 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006187.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Langhorne, Janice M Collier, Patricia J Bate, Matthew NT Thuy, Julie Bernhardt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 503 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 14%
Student > Bachelor 57 11%
Researcher 39 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 6%
Other 28 6%
Other 89 17%
Unknown 193 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 19%
Neuroscience 27 5%
Engineering 10 2%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 42 8%
Unknown 216 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2022.
All research outputs
#427,533
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#748
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,232
of 360,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.