↓ Skip to main content

Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
229 tweeters
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006187.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Langhorne, Janice M Collier, Patricia J Bate, Matthew NT Thuy, Julie Bernhardt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 229 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 223 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 55 24%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 20%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Engineering 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 61 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#127,948
of 15,904,854 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#252
of 11,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,133
of 275,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,904,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.