↓ Skip to main content

Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
228 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006187.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Langhorne, Janice M Collier, Patricia J Bate, Matthew NT Thuy, Julie Bernhardt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Other 13 8%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 43 26%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 18%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Unspecified 8 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 42 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#101,571
of 14,179,012 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#208
of 10,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,884
of 269,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,179,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.